Judul : Ethics UWH Player to Referee (Part I)
link : Ethics UWH Player to Referee (Part I)
Ethics UWH Player to Referee (Part I)
By Christianto Sahat
Often, in a UWH game, there was
controversy over a refereeing decision. Players feel a violation has
occurred, but the referee did not do a callout (stop the game to give the
punishment / penalty as appropriate) for such breach.
How should players
address these controversies?
There are several
things that cause the referee doing the above:
1. The referee saw
that the violation did not reduce the benefit of the parties
violated.
Case in point: White
Team, a very strong team, being in a position to master puck with his right
hand. The black team tried to grab the puck, and when seized it stick did not
touch the puck, but his left hand touching the opponent. White Team
could still master the puck, and not bothered at all to the inside page.
The referee decided that the incident did not harm the white team, and
did not stop the game.
2. The referee saw
the violation, but imposed "Advantage Rule" (Advantage rule in
effect).
Advantage rule is
a condition in which the referee saw violations, but did not do a callout,
considering that the team would be harmed if it violated callout done
immediately. Instead of doing a callout at the time, he chose to delay callout,
until the puck changes hands to a violation.
Case in point: White
Team was master puck, and in position 4 meters from the black team's goal. Black
team defender attempts a tackle, but the tackle hit the opponent's body. White
Team can still dominate puck and drove to the goal, though violated. The
referee saw the violation, and gave the signal "Advantage Rule in
effect", with twirling his index finger. White Team continues to lead puck
into the opponent's goal, but the goal did not happen because another defender
of the black team wins the puck. The referee did callout, and gives advantage
to gain puck white team, due to a previous offense.
In this example,
the referee did not do a callout immediately, because he saw the white team was
close to the goal and in a position close to scoring. But as soon as the goal
was not the case, and the black team dominated puck, immediately he did
callout, and provide penalties for the black team, for the benefit of the white
team.
So what if the
white team scored? The referee will forget that the black team's offense and it
sees as it has never happened, although in fact the referee saw it.
3. The process of
a referee is a long learning process, often in the form of trial and error,
And experience is
the key. There are times when the violation occurs in a very fast and the
referee did not see it, because so many of the players cover the other players.
And this is a very human thing. Member-member JUHC is expected to learn and try
to referee, to feel it yourself.
Or there is the
case that the referee FEELS that the violation did not occur, but he did not
SEE it. The referee cannot do a callout in this case, because he should be
objective, he had actually seen an offense if he wanted to do a callout, not
based on perception or feeling alone.
Then, how the attitude
of the player when he feels need an explanation of the decision of the referee?
During the game
progresses, players are forbidden to speak to the referee. Only the team
captain is allowed to speak to the referee. Players can ask the captain of the
team, to speak to the referee, asking for an explanation (politely).
The referee was
right not to give, or delay an explanation. The referee has the right to give a
time penalty (the player out of the game for 2 or 5 minutes) if the player is
harassing or protested the referee's decision in a way that is not polite.
Once the game is completed, the player may be coming to the referee, to
ask for an explanation (politely). The referee was right not to give an
explanation, if he is not willing. Do not think once the game is completed,
players can threaten or curse the referee, because in international
tournaments, it can be reported to the committee of the match, and the player
can be given punishmen
Demikianlah Artikel Ethics UWH Player to Referee (Part I)
Sekianlah artikel
Ethics UWH Player to Referee (Part I)
kali ini, mudah-mudahan bisa memberi manfaat untuk anda semua. baiklah, sampai jumpa di postingan artikel lainnya.
Anda sekarang membaca artikel Ethics UWH Player to Referee (Part I) dengan alamat link http://mywaterhobbies.blogspot.com/2012/10/ethics-uwh-player-to-referee-part-i.html